Friday 9 February 2018

The way we Deliver

I spend my life trying to continuously improve (or am I just hypercritical?). So, I was reflecting recently on project delivery and product development and the journey I’ve taken in my career.

I look back with great fondness on the days of the dot.com era and remember what fun we all had building products and delivering enormous projects.  The wonderful people I worked with come to mind most easily, primarily because we spent 12, 14, 16 hour days together - working, working, working.  

At the time, we were innovative, building cutting-edge digital product but our delivery processes were not.  We needed huge, bloated teams, part of siloed business units; who designed and development via massively inefficient processes, swamped in reams of paper-based documentation, shared in meeting after meeting where we discussed points in detail, some of which were obviously (and critically) forgotten or missed.  Reflecting back now, the structural inefficiencies were significant and didn’t deliver any organisational benefits.  Decision-making, measurement and delivery decisions were short-term based.  We engaged customers, on occasion, but only as we were about to launch, once we’d built the entire product, having made most of the investment and where it was too late to make wholesale change.  In the marketplace, more nimble competitors were providing a viable view of a different way of delivering for the first time which was both exciting and terrifying, & depending on the organization, elicited a different response.

It would be lovely to think that those days are gone but many modern organisations remain plagued with the problems of old. So how do we change this?

I’m fortunate that for the past 10 years or so, I’ve been able to work in organisations that have either completely moved away from that mode of operation, or are trying to do so.
There’s a growing need for organisations to adapt though because they are moving and changing faster than ever, and being challenged externally.  This is generating unprecedented levels of uncertainty.  

Some places, like the ones I’ve been working in, have responded by adapting their operating and delivery models in a bid to grow, thrive and survive. (In one case this didn’t happen and the organisation ceased to exist, so there’s a very real consequence of not adapting)

In these types of enterprises, more people-driven processes such as Jurgen Appelo’s Management 3.0 practices, might be used.  The influence of Eris Ries, founder of lean start-up, and Ash Maurya who created GOLEAN and the lean canvas to help better focus on customer problems, are likely to be in evidence.   Continuous agile and lean start-up delivery methodology forms the delivery toolkit. Enacting this kind of fundamental delivery-based change in an organisation is hard. Critical to sustaining this type of change is the shift in mindset, behaviour and culture change required to allow for success.  While there’s a lot to be said about the actual toolkits to be used to deliver (& I can talk for days), increasingly important to me is the thinking processes that are applied to any delivery. When I’m getting set for a new initiative the starting point is ensuring connection and alignment.  I undertake a process between the people and the work to enable the connection between the Strategy-Vision-Purpose-Day-to-Day Deliverables – to be understood.  The beginning and the end of delivery can be summed up for me – I create a vision so that people come to work with a sense of purpose and leave with a sense of accomplishment.  I believe that once I do that, delivering follows naturally (I hope!) I’ll continue talking about the mechanics of using the toolkit next time…








Monday 17 April 2017

STEM isn't the silver-bullet

Talking about STEM/STEAM 

Another reason we started this podcast was in response to the constancy of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Maths) or STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Maths) being portrayed as the panacea to the wicked problem of gender diversity and overall inclusivity.

Yes, STEM/STEAM is critically important. And yes, it's a no-brainer that we expect and demand that our daughter, who loves, and is very good at maths, should continue to have equal access and encouragement to continue participating in maths, science, tech and engineering subjects throughout her schooling. This may or may not include coding.

Solving today's problems today

However, the issue for people such as Robert and I who work in Technology organisations and roles today, is that we have a problem today. That we need to solve today, for today and tomorrow. The STEM/STEAM horizon is addressing critical, systemic issues in the education system which means a longterm, multi-year outlook.  We're after something much quicker for people experiencing issues and entering the industry today. Juniors trying to find employment are having a difficulty, at at time when there's a significant pipeline issue.  It takes a substantive investment in time and money; and particular mentoring skill to support and equip juniors to become work-ready.  University computer degrees don't necessarily teach work-ready skills; neither do the professional courses. And nor should we expect that someone effectively coming through a theoretical apprenticeship would be big-wide-world ready.  However, we need a pipeline to meet the growing gap of tech people that's experienced by every organisation.

Juniors are not a gendered issue

One strategy to address this gap is to 'grow your own' people through mentoring juniors - and most organisations can't wait the 20 years it will take for STEM/STEAM policies to kick in for help with this one.  This is not a gendered issue. Both male and female juniors alike struggle to find and then retain their positions in organisations which have sometimes underestimated the effort to train and equip a junior.

STEM/STEAM is already proving why it will be a longterm solution

Which is again why we started our techwomentalkingg podcast.  We know lots of people making everyday and systemic changes today, and we wanted to start hearing their stories.  Our first interview was Alexia MacDonald, a RailGirls alumnae whose first tech role came directly from her RailsGirls experience. She's an example of why the STEM/STEAM payoff is going to be a long haul. Alexia came out of a computing degree, not really ready to walk into a role.  There's no well-known route into a range of computing roles (eg product managers, designers or scrum masters). Unlike other professions, these paths still need to be created.  It's going to take a while.

Some of our other interviews have similarly explored this conundrum.  We had a fascinating discussion with Jane Nguyen and Candi Goodison from Redbubble.  Candi is completing her degree while working at Redbubble and it was great chatting about Jane and Candi's similar but different perspectives on life in the bubble.  Robert's last role saw him mentoring a junior dev who came out of a $12,000 software development professional course with high hopes; a willing attitude; the most wonderful personality in the world; a previous electrical engineering degree; and almost no ability to program. 3 months' unpaid internship and some patient mentoring, turned into a junior role in a start-up. This came after months of rejected code tests which were demeaning, demoralising and fundamentally attacked his confidence.

STEM/STEAM is a great solution to a component of the problem.  As our conversations have shown to date, we need to be clear that there are multiple problems we're trying to solve. STEM/STEAM can help.  Just not today.  



Why this podcast?

Why not this podcast?

Well, Robert and I have been talking to various tech women for a little while now and we've just made our podcasts live. 

It's been an interesting, and really encouraging journey for us so far.  Even since we started a couple of months ago, the gender conversation seems to have a bit more fire in it (this may just be cognitive bias).  One of the reasons I reached out to talk to people was that I knew there were great, positive examples of wonderful change to be shared and wanted to help spotlight some of these great stories. We've both been looking for more examples and more answers for what others do everyday to improve daily life for women (and therefore everyone); to introduce into our own workplaces, so we thought this might be helpful to others too.  And, it's exciting that we're starting to find lots of these examples. 

So, while things are looking up, there have also been a few awkward moments where people have popped up, just joining the conversation, a bit late to the party, and publicly declaring that they've just realised there's a problem.  Reading these pieces on linkedin, Medium, Twitter, Facebook or wherever other good opinions are shared, one only needs to count to ten, before there quickly follows the 'haters-gonna-hate' comments; or the this isn't me 'some-of-my-best-friends-are-women' decriers; or the 'I'm-a-great-woman-there's-no-problem-women-just-need-to-learn-to-negotiate-better' comments.  This could get you down if you let it.  

There is a problem.  We've already learned a lot from our kind and gracious guests, we invite you to do the same:
  • Tune in
  • Listen to real women share their stories on techwomentalkingg (& others)
  • Take note of the talker's tips
  • Send us any feedback 
  • Suggest a techwomentalker
  • Become a techwomentalker 

Saturday 15 April 2017

My great-great-great-great granddaughter will finally receive pay equity (if all goes to current plan). Perhaps we could change this??

Iceland has done it.* Rwanda is 5th on the 2016 World Economic Forum Global Gender Pay Gap Scale, while Australia is ranked 46, down 10 places in 2015. 


Source:Global Gender Gap Index 2016, World Economic Forum
What's going on? 
Current projections are that it will take an average of 118 years to achieve pay equity. 

Using the Gender parity calculator on the WEF website, my outlook isn't even that rosy. And, it seems that things have also been going backwards in the last 3 years.

                                                                             











However, there are some glimmers of hope.  Iceland announced their solution to pay equity this International Women's Day & it's a good one. Icelandic private & public businesses of 25+ people must prove that they offer equal pay to men and women.  This strategy will still take time but by 2022, they'll have equity (they also mandated 40% female representation on boards).  

So what can be done?

Well, we can decide to pay men and women equally.  When you think about it, really stop & think about it, it's hard to explain why there's a difference.  

ANZ created a beautiful, compelling video 'equal future' campaign, where girls are potentially offered less pocket money than boys. The comments from the kids are priceless.  Have a look...  

The World Economic Forum suggests some other strategies for gender parity below. 

We need to get busy  

I had an incredibly uncomfortable conversation with my daughter this evening talking about why she wasn't going to be paid as much as the boys in her class when she starts working. It's weird, illogical and sickening; made worse because I know it's happened to me.  Her comments were simple, "What's good for the goose is good for the gander - but I want to be a swan anyway."

Sunday 19 March 2017

Seonaid Porter-Boldly shining a light on high impact Australian diversity initiatives-TWTG-01

Seonaid Porter has inspired and championed countless individuals and organisations through the #BOLDMOVES ThinkTank, focusing on challenging the 'wicked problem' of diversity. Seonaid has a unique combination of skills from a lifetime of big corporate roles combining HR, IT and Project Management with transformation, agile and creatively-driven side projects. Seonaid can't help but make change happen wherever she goes. 

Seonaid has huge amounts of energy, so let her enthusiasm inspire you too, listen here.

Alexia McDonald-Constantly learning around the world, because that's how tech works-TWTG-02

Alexia McDonald is emblematic of the new breed of developer the IT industry is calling out for; but one who has a different set of expectations. Currently working in Sweden where she's leading the Swedish chapter of RailsGirls, Alexia's continuing her global learning quest. She hasn't taken a traditional path to arriving as a coder. She secured her first job via RailsGirls; has been presenting around the world despite working professionally for under 2 years; and is an active advocate for workplace inclusion. Alexia has a world view for herself, for women in tech and won't be boxed in by youth or geographical borders. 

Listen here for Alexia's take on the industry today. 

Seeing the signs

We were editing Alexia's podcast last week & our daughter skipped past just as Alexia talked about her little sister's struggles with maths because she'd been told at school that she wasn't good at maths. We know that this is the experience for many little girls (& some boys).  And it's one aspect of the school curriculum that's ripe for redress & is thankfully getting some attention at many levels.

Imagine our delight then, when our daughter took up the call & as she spun away, dancing up the stairs, entertained herself with a monologue that questioned this set of circumstances 'Not like maths. I love maths, maths is my favourite subject.  I know lots of maths.'  She took it a little too far when she finished by saying 'I know everything in maths' but she is 6 and I for one have no desire to shatter that unshakeable & fleeting confidence.

I want her to know that if Maths thinking will increasingly help run the world, then sums such as the one below need to drive her.  We need to make sure we advocate to provide equal access for boys & girls to basic learning opportunities such as maths in classrooms.

A great attitude + equal access + opportunity = best set up for life